Fundamentally, if you do not care whether you are out participate in conversations while you would with individuals you’re down with, but there is you should not announce anything, just response truthfully when they ask. If they are spouting down prejudices that are specific bis, go on and state those do not connect with you. If the problem is merely gay/bi legal rights in general, argue it through the point of view of a individual, maybe perhaps perhaps not someone playing the straw guy homo card to pull some heartstrings to your part. published by schroedinger at 2:41 PM on August 23, 2005 I like xo’s analogy about moms with dead young ones. A whole lot. Thanks, xo, I’d been shopping for a beneficial one.
grahamwell, i am actually confused regarding your confusion:
In less political contexts too, such as for example everybody else dealing with the attractiveness of a female, me saying she actually is not too hot, one member of the family saying, « oh yeah? she wouldn’t make that line is crossed by you? (smirk, wink) ». That discussion could only occur in an assumed context that is heterosexual a man (clearly). Or did you know one thing I do not? This how we notice it: Anon’s in legislation: « do not you might think Paris Hilton is hot? » Anon (feminine): « No, ew. » Anon’s in legislation: « Oh yeah? She would not make that line is crossed by you? smirk, wink. » (presumption of anon’s heterosexuality) Anon (female): thinks « No, ew, but Maura Tierney, hoo kid! » but states absolutely nothing.
I do not even comprehend the manner in which you envision it going. We additionally do not know though I think bi women and bi men are perceived as having different agendas or motivations or something, so maybe it does if it matters. published by librarina at 3:40 PM on August 23, 2005 here is the difficulty we see. Continuer la lecture de « Erm, I do not understand if i am describing this precisely. Fundamentally, when you don’t… »